Understanding the Differences Between 13 Bit ARRI RAW and 16 Bit RED RAW

ARRI vs REDAniket Bhattacharjee

0:00

1. Introduction: Demystifying RAW Bit Depth in Digital Cinema

ARRI and RED stand as prominent innovators in the digital cinema camera market, each establishing a distinct presence through their unique engineering philosophies and product offerings. ARRI is widely recognized for its "filmic" aesthetic, celebrated for organic images, natural skin tones, and exceptional reliability, making its cameras a staple in high-end feature film and television productions.¹ Conversely, RED has consistently advanced the capabilities of resolution, providing highly modular and customizable camera systems. This approach often appeals to independent filmmakers, visual effects (VFX) artists, and productions that prioritize ultra-high resolution capture for extensive post-production flexibility.²

The numerical specification of RAW bit depth, such as 13-bit versus 16-bit, is a frequently highlighted yet often misunderstood metric in digital cinematography. It is a common perception that a higher number automatically translates to superior image quality. However, the actual impact of bit depth is deeply intertwined with underlying image science, including encoding methodologies (linear versus logarithmic) and compression techniques.³ The common industry practice of equating higher numerical specifications with superior quality, often seen in marketing narratives using phrases like "MORE = BETTER" ⁶, necessitates a deeper examination. This report will move beyond these surface-level comparisons to critically analyze the technical implementations and their practical advantages, providing a comprehensive understanding of their real-world implications in digital cinema production.

2. Foundational Concepts: Bit Depth, Dynamic Range, and Encoding

2.1. Defining Bit Depth in Digital Imaging

Bit depth, also known as color depth, quantifies the number of discrete tonal values available to represent color and brightness information for each pixel in a digital image.⁸ A higher bit depth provides a greater number of possible values, leading to richer color gradations, smoother transitions between tones, and a broader range of brightness levels. This increased precision significantly reduces visible artifacts such as "banding," which appears as abrupt steps in color gradients.⁸ Mathematically, a system with N bits can represent 2^N distinct values. For example, 13-bit offers 2^13 = 8,192 distinct values per color channel, while 16-bit provides 2^16 = 65,536 values per channel.⁷

2.2. The Relationship Between Bit Depth and Dynamic Range

Dynamic range defines the total range of light intensities—from the deepest shadows to the brightest highlights—that a camera sensor can physically capture.¹ While a higher bit depth provides the

capacity to store a wider dynamic range, it is crucial to understand that bit depth itself does not create dynamic range.³ The actual dynamic range is fundamentally limited by the sensor's physical characteristics, including its photon shot noise and read noise.³ For instance, ARRI's ALEV3 and ALEV4 sensors boast impressive dynamic ranges of 14+ and 17 stops, respectively.¹

A camera boasting a higher bit depth output does not necessarily yield more usable or perceptually superior information if its sensor's inherent noise floor is high, or if the data distribution is inefficient. Conversely, a camera with a lower recorded bit depth but a superior sensor and optimized encoding can deliver excellent usable image quality. This highlights that the actual performance advantage is not solely determined by the numerical bit depth but by the quality and utility of the data contained within those bits.

2.3. Linear vs. Logarithmic Encoding: Impact on Data Efficiency and Post-Production

2.3.1. Linear Encoding

In a linear encoding scheme, the digital code values directly correspond to the linear increase in light captured by the sensor. Theoretically, each successive stop of exposure (a doubling of light) is recorded with twice as many code values as the preceding stop.¹⁶ This method accurately reflects the physical light captured by the sensor.⁵ However, a significant drawback is the disproportionate allocation of data to the brightest stops, where the human eye is less sensitive to subtle gradations. This can lead to a relative "starvation" of data in the shadow regions, which are perceptually more critical.⁶ True 12-bit linear RAW is rare for high dynamic range cameras because it often lacks sufficient bits to adequately represent both highlights and shadows across a wide range without significant quantization issues.¹⁶

2.3.2. Logarithmic Encoding (LogC)

Logarithmic encoding, exemplified by ARRI's Log C (LogC3 and the newer LogC4), is designed to distribute the available bit depth more efficiently across the entire dynamic range.⁶ By compressing highlights and expanding shadows, it assigns a more equal number of code values per stop, which closely mirrors the non-linear way the human eye perceives light.⁵ This approach maximizes the

perceptual quality and flexibility within a given bit depth, making it highly efficient for storing high dynamic range information.⁶

ARRI's rationale for adopting LogC encoding is explicitly tied to human visual perception. Logarithmic encoding is designed to "better represent how the human eye perceives light" ⁷ and allocates code values more densely in areas where human vision is most sensitive, such as shadows and mid-tones.⁶ This reflects a deliberate design philosophy where the perceptual quality and flexibility for human viewing and grading are prioritized over a purely mathematical, linear representation that might allocate excessive bits to areas of less visual importance, such as extremely bright, clipped highlights. This approach helps explain ARRI's decision to record in a seemingly lower 13-bit log format, even when its internal processing is higher. It indicates that ARRI believes its chosen encoding method, combined with its sensor technology, delivers optimal perceived image quality and grading latitude without the need for the larger file sizes associated with a full 16-bit linear recording.

2.3.3. Floating-Point Math

Some systems, even when recording "16-bit linear" data, may employ floating-point math. This allows for a more flexible allocation of code values, often dedicating more precision to the darker stops where subtle detail is crucial. This effectively provides some of the benefits of log encoding within a linear framework.¹⁶ For instance, ACES, a widely adopted color management system, utilizes floating-point math to handle dynamic ranges exceeding 16 stops.¹⁷

3. ARRI's Approach: The 13-bit Log ARRIRAW Rationale

3.1. Internal Processing vs. Recorded Format in ARRI Cameras

ARRI's image processing chain is meticulously designed to maintain the highest quality from capture to output. Internally, ARRI cameras transport and process uncompressed 16-bit and even 18-bit raw data directly from the sensor.¹ This high internal bit depth is crucial for preserving maximum precision during the initial analog-to-digital conversion and subsequent internal image processing before the data is written to media.

However, the recorded ARRIRAW data is provided as uncompressed, 12-bit (for older ALEXA models) or 13-bit (specifically for the ALEXA 35 with its ALEV4 sensor) log-encoded ARRIRAW.¹¹ This distinction is fundamental: while the sensor

captures data at a very high bit depth, the output format is strategically optimized for storage efficiency and post-production flexibility through its proprietary logarithmic encoding.

3.2. The "Why": ARRI's Philosophy on Data Efficiency, Visual Perception, and Workflow

ARRI explicitly states that "16 bit linear encoding is neither efficient nor necessary for recording images".⁷ Their rationale is that image data can be converted from an internal 16-bit linear representation to a 12-bit or 13-bit log format "without any loss of information or quality, but with a great savings of data rate and data volume".⁷

The core of this strategy lies in the LogC curve (LogC3 for previous generations, LogC4 for ALEXA 35/265), which is meticulously designed to encode brightness changes and efficiently capture the sensor's wide dynamic range.¹⁵ Logarithmic encoding assigns a "fairly equal number of code values to each stop," which ARRI believes "is more efficient than 16 bit linear and better represents how the human eye perceives light".⁷ This ensures that the most perceptually important information—detail in mid-tones, nuanced shadows, and smooth highlight roll-off—is preserved with high fidelity, while simultaneously optimizing data rates for practical production workflows.⁷

ARRI's strategy is not about simply maximizing the raw bit count on disk, but about optimizing the data to deliver the highest perceptual quality and post-production flexibility within a manageable data footprint. This explains why ARRI does not record 16-bit RAW: their sophisticated engineering philosophy focuses on practical utility, perceived image quality, and efficient workflow.

3.3. ARRI's Color Science and Dynamic Range: Achieving the "Filmic Look" with LogC

ARRI's ALEV3 and ALEV4 sensors are renowned for their exceptional dynamic range, offering 14+ stops and 17 stops respectively, captured without the need for special High Dynamic Range (HDR) modes.¹ This wide dynamic range is fully accessible in both ARRIRAW and LogC encoded ProRes footage.¹¹

The LogC curve, coupled with ARRI's advanced REVEAL Color Science (for ALEXA 35/265) and ARRI Wide Gamut (AWG4), is instrumental in achieving the camera's signature look: natural color reproduction, pleasing skin tones, and excellent color separation, which is particularly beneficial for visual effects work.¹ ARRI cameras are consistently praised for their "film-like, organic look" and their ability to render highlights with a smooth, graceful roll-off.¹ This aesthetic quality is a direct outcome of their meticulously engineered imaging chain, from the sensor's large photosites and Dual Gain Architecture to the optical low pass filter and sophisticated image processing software.¹

The perceived superiority of ARRI's image quality, despite a lower recorded bit depth compared to RED, underscores that raw bit depth is merely one component in a complex system. ARRI's success demonstrates that a comprehensive approach to image science, deeply rooted in film emulation principles, can yield outstanding results, even with a more "efficient" (lower bit count) recorded RAW format.

3.4. ARRIRAW and High Density Encoding (HDE): Uncompressed Quality with Manageable Data

ARRIRAW is ARRI's proprietary format for uncompressed, unencrypted, and uncompromised sensor data, often likened to a "digital version of the camera negative".²⁷ It is the only format that fully retains the camera's natural color response and extensive exposure latitude as unprocessed sensor data, providing maximum flexibility in post-production.²⁷

To address the substantial file sizes associated with uncompressed RAW, ARRI developed High Density Encoding (HDE). HDE is a lossless, variable bitrate encoding scheme specifically for ARRIRAW data. It can reduce the data footprint of ARRIRAW by a significant 40-50% while guaranteeing a bit-exact match to the original files upon decoding.¹¹ This innovation allows productions to achieve substantial storage savings and faster data transfers without any compromise in image quality.²⁷

4. RED's Approach: The 16-bit Linear (and Compressed) RED RAW

4.1. Marketing vs. Technical Reality: RED's 16-bit Claims

RED cameras are prominently marketed as capturing 16-bit RAW.³⁰ However, the actual recorded REDCODE RAW (.r3d) is a highly compressed format, frequently described as 12-bit float or 12-bit log encoding in practice.⁶ While the sensor's Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) may indeed operate at 16-bit, this raw data is then processed and compressed into a 12-bit equivalent format for recording.⁷

This distinction is a common point of confusion in the industry: the internal processing bit depth often exceeds the recorded bit depth, and the chosen encoding (linear versus log) significantly influences how efficiently those bits are utilized within the compressed file. RED's marketing of "16-bit linear" ⁵ coexists with the reality of its "visually lossless" compression ³¹, which often results in a 12-bit float or log-like encoding for the actual R3D file.⁶ This presents a subtle but crucial distinction. While the

initial sensor readout might be linear and 16-bit, the recorded format is not a raw, uncompressed 16-bit linear stream. The compression is a necessary and sophisticated step to manage the immense data rates associated with high resolutions (e.g., 8K) while keeping file sizes practical for production.³⁴ The "16-bit linear" claim from RED primarily refers to the internal processing pipeline and the

potential data fidelity, rather than the literal bit depth of the raw file as stored on media. The practical implementation is a highly efficient, compressed format that leverages the benefits of log-like data distribution or floating-point math to effectively contain a wide dynamic range within a smaller, compressed bit depth.

4.2. REDCODE RAW Compression: "Visually Lossless" and its Implications

REDCODE RAW is RED's proprietary, compressed RAW format.³¹ It is characterized as "visually lossless" ³¹, meaning that while it employs lossy compression (data is discarded), the resulting image is designed to be indistinguishable from uncompressed RAW to the human eye under typical viewing conditions.

REDCODE offers various compression ratios (e.g., 3:1, 5:1, 8:1, 10:1), which provide filmmakers with tunable file sizes and extended recording times.³¹ While higher ratios are lossy, the minimum compression ratio (e.g., 3:1 on some Epic models) has been described as "mathematically lossless" for the full 12-bit data.³³ This compression technology is crucial for managing the "massive detail in 8K imagery," making ultra-high resolution capture practical for production.³⁴ The compression often utilizes wavelet-based algorithms, similar to JPEG2000, applied to the Bayer mosaic data, which can affect the individual color planes differently.³³

4.3. RED's Design Philosophy: Emphasis on High Resolution and Modularity

RED's core design philosophy has historically centered on pushing the boundaries of resolution, offering cameras capable of 4K, 6K, and 8K capture.² This emphasis on high resolution is driven by the belief that it provides unparalleled creative flexibility in post-production, enabling capabilities such as pan & scan, super resolution, post zoom, stabilization, and advanced VFX.³¹

RED cameras are also known for their modular design, allowing cinematographers to build highly customized camera rigs tailored to specific production needs.³⁸ While this modularity offers significant versatility, it can also introduce complexity in setup and potentially more points of failure compared to ARRI's more integrated and robust systems.² REDCODE RAW facilitates non-destructive editing and retains extensive metadata, providing significant flexibility for adjusting parameters like ISO and white balance in post-production.³⁴

The consistent emphasis on high resolutions (4K, 6K, 8K) as a core tenet of RED's camera design ² indicates that the REDCODE compression technology is explicitly positioned as "critical for managing the massive detail in 8K imagery".³⁴ This causal link suggests that RED's pursuit of extreme resolution is a fundamental driver for their technical choices, including the development of their highly efficient compression algorithms. RED's strategic approach is to provide maximum

resolution and then develop advanced compression techniques to make that resolution practical and manageable within a production workflow. This contrasts with ARRI's primary focus on achieving a "filmic look" and optimizing dynamic range and color science, where resolution, while important, is secondary to overall image aesthetics and usability.³⁸ These differing priorities lead to distinct technical implementations of what each company defines as "RAW."

5. Comparative Analysis: 13-bit Log vs. 16-bit Linear RAW

5.1. Technical Differences in Data Representation

The fundamental differences in how ARRI and RED approach RAW data capture and storage are summarized in the table below. This comparison highlights that the numerical bit depth is only one aspect of a complex imaging pipeline, with encoding type and compression playing equally critical roles in the final image characteristics and workflow implications.

Feature	ARRI RAW (e.g., ALEXA 35)	RED RAW (e.g., V-RAPTOR)
Sensor ADC Bit Depth (Internal)	16-bit / 18-bit 1	16-bit 6
Recorded RAW Bit Depth	12-bit / 13-bit (LogC) 11	Marketed as 16-bit, practically 12-bit float/log 6
Encoding Type	Logarithmic (LogC3, LogC4) 11	Linear (with floating-point/compression effects) 5
Compression Type	Uncompressed (optional lossless HDE) 27	Proprietary "visually lossless" (REDCODE RAW) with variable ratios 31
Dynamic Range (Stops)	14+ (ALEV3), 17 (ALEV4) 1	High (less consistently cited, focus on "biggest canvas") 31
Typical File Size (Examples)	Large, HDE reduces 40-50%. ALEXA LF Open Gate ARRIRAW: 20.9 MB/frame; HDE: 12.5 MB/frame 11	Manageable due to compression. 6K HQ: ~280 MB/s 31
Primary Design Philosophy	Filmic Look, Color Science, Dynamic Range Latitude 1	Resolution, Modularity, Compression Efficiency 2

5.2. Practical Impact on Image Quality and Post-Production

The question of "how much better is 16-bit RAW compared to 13-bit RAW" cannot be answered solely by the numerical difference in bit depth. The true performance advantage depends on a confluence of factors: the sensor's actual dynamic range, its noise floor, the efficiency and intelligence of the encoding method (log vs. linear), and the practical limits of human perception and display technology. The observation that "the benefits of 16-bit precision over 14-bit are negligible for photographic applications" because "quantization noise is well below the sensor's analog noise floor" ¹⁴ suggests that beyond a certain threshold (often considered 10-12 bits for human perception), simply adding more bits may not translate to

perceptible or usable information if the sensor's inherent noise or the limits of human vision are reached.¹⁴ ARRI's 13-bit log, by intelligently distributing data across the dynamic range, aims to maximize

usable information within its bit budget.

The detailed comparison reveals a fundamental divergence in the engineering philosophies of ARRI and RED. ARRI prioritizes a "filmic look," robust color science, and graceful highlight/shadow roll-off, optimizing for a consistent and aesthetically pleasing image straight out of the camera, even if it means a lower recorded bit depth via log encoding.¹ RED, conversely, prioritizes extreme high resolution and then develops sophisticated compression to make that data manageable, which can lead to a "crisper" or more "dramatic" image.² These distinct choices have cascading effects on workflow, storage requirements, and the specific strengths of each system in post-production.

5.2.1. Dynamic Range and Exposure Latitude

ARRI cameras are celebrated for their exceptional highlight roll-off and robust shadow detail preservation.¹ The ALEXA 35, with its ALEV4 sensor, achieves an impressive 17 stops of dynamic range, gaining 1.5 stops in the highlights and 1 stop in the shadows over previous ALEXA models.¹⁵ Its LogC encoding efficiently distributes these stops, making the footage remarkably forgiving for exposure adjustments in post-production.¹²

While RED cameras are capable of capturing a wide dynamic range, some comparative tests suggest ARRI may offer more highlight headroom.²⁶ RED footage, particularly when significantly underexposed and then re-balanced, has been observed to lose color detail and clip information in shadows sooner than ARRI.²⁶ This indicates that while RED captures a broad range, the distribution of data within that range or the effects of compression might make extreme shadow recovery more challenging.

5.2.2. Color Grading Flexibility

ARRIRAW and LogC provide maximum flexibility and control for color grading, preserving the most image data for extensive adjustments.²⁷ ARRI's renowned color science, known for natural skin tones and accurate color separation, often means less intensive grading is required to achieve a pleasing final look.² The even distribution of code values in LogC encoding also effectively prevents banding during aggressive grading.¹²

REDCODE RAW allows for broad post-production adjustments, including non-destructive changes to ISO and white balance.³⁴ However, some colorists have noted that RED footage might require more specific attention to skin tones or overall color balance compared to ARRI.⁴⁰ While generally excellent, RED's "visually lossless" compression might introduce subtle artifacts or exhibit less resilience under extremely aggressive grading conditions.⁴¹

5.2.3. VFX Workflows

ARRIRAW is considered an optimal format for high-quality visual effects production due to its uncompromised sensor data and superior color separation.¹ The robust color fidelity and the comparatively less noisy blue channel (crucial for clean green/blue screen keying) make ARRI a preferred choice for many VFX artists, even with its 13-bit log encoding.¹

RED's emphasis on high resolution is a significant advantage for VFX, offering greater flexibility for reframing, digital stabilization, and super-sampling.³¹ While REDCODE RAW is designed to facilitate VFX workflows ³⁷, some comparisons suggest ARRI might offer cleaner keying and better color fidelity in extreme pushes.²⁶ However, recent advancements in RED's image processing pipeline (IPP2) have significantly improved its capabilities for VFX.²⁶

5.2.4. Low-Light Performance and Noise

ARRI cameras are engineered for high sensitivity and exceptionally low noise levels, maintaining their impressive dynamic range across a broad spectrum of Exposure Index (EI) settings.¹ The ALEV4 sensor in the ALEXA 35 notably includes an "Enhanced Sensitivity" mode for even cleaner images in challenging low-light scenarios.¹⁵ ARRIRAW, due to its wider dynamic range and efficient encoding, generally offers superior performance in low-light conditions.²⁸

RED cameras are also capable of producing clean, very low-noise images in low-light environments.³⁸ However, some comparative tests indicate that ARRI might handle underexposure with less visible noise and better color retention in the deepest shadows.²⁶

5.2.5. Workflow Efficiency and Storage

Uncompressed ARRIRAW generates very large file sizes, necessitating substantial storage infrastructure and powerful post-production systems.²⁸ However, the implementation of HDE dramatically reduces the data footprint.¹¹ Additionally, ARRI's ProRes 4444 is a widely adopted, more manageable alternative that still delivers excellent image quality and is frequently used by ARRI shooters.²⁸

REDCODE RAW's effective compression allows for significantly more manageable file sizes compared to uncompressed RAW, translating to longer recording times on smaller media.³¹ This can result in lower overall storage costs and quicker data transfer times for productions.³⁵ While offering versatility, RED's modular design can sometimes add complexity to on-set workflows and often requires proprietary RED-brand accessories.²

6. Conclusion: Choosing the Right RAW for Your Project (ARRI RAW and RED RAW as same, as they're different)

ARRI and RED both stand as leaders in digital cinema, delivering exceptional image quality, yet they achieve this excellence through fundamentally different technical philosophies regarding RAW data capture and encoding. ARRI prioritizes the efficient distribution of data through its logarithmic encoding (LogC), maximizing perceivable dynamic range and color fidelity within a highly optimized 12-bit or 13-bit footprint. RED, on the other hand, focuses on capturing ultra-high resolutions (up to 8K) and then employs sophisticated "visually lossless" compression (REDCODE RAW) to make its internal 16-bit linear sensor data practical for recording.

The raw bit depth number, when viewed in isolation, is an insufficient metric for determining overall image quality or post-production flexibility. ARRI's enduring success with its 13-bit LogC ARRIRAW demonstrates convincingly that intelligent encoding, coupled with superior sensor technology and refined color science, can yield results that are comparable to, or even surpass, higher bit-depth linear formats in terms of usable dynamic range, graceful highlight roll-off, and accurate color rendition. The inherent noise floor of the camera sensor and the perceptual limits of the human eye play a more significant role than simply having a larger number of bits to store potentially noisy or redundant data.¹⁴

The detailed analysis, while highlighting differences, also reveals a convergence in the outcome of image quality, even if the methods differ. Both companies strive to deliver excellent dynamic range and grading flexibility. ARRI achieves this through optimized log encoding and sensor performance, while RED achieves it through high resolution and sophisticated compression. The observation that the gap in "visually tangible and qualitative benefits" between RAW and advanced RGB formats like ProRes has shrunk ⁴⁵ further supports this idea of convergence in perceived quality. The debate is increasingly less about the raw bit count itself and more about the underlying

engineering philosophy and workflow implications of each system. Both are "industry standards" ³⁸, but they specialize in different aspects.

It is also apparent that the term "RAW" is not uniformly applied across manufacturers. ARRI's RAW is uncompressed sensor data but log-encoded.¹¹ RED's RAW is compressed ³¹ and, despite being described as linear, often behaves like a float/log internally due to compression.⁶ This highlights that camera manufacturers are continuously innovating how they capture, process, and package "raw" sensor data to balance the competing demands of image quality, file size, and workflow efficiency. A deep understanding of the specific encoding (linear vs. log) and compression (uncompressed, mathematically lossless, visually lossless) applied by each manufacturer is more critical than the headline bit depth when evaluating a camera's true capabilities and its suitability for a given project.

Ultimately, the "better" RAW format is subjective and depends entirely on the specific creative vision, technical demands, and logistical constraints of a given production.³⁸

• Choose ARRI RAW (13-bit LogC) if:

• The primary creative objective is a natural, organic, film-like aesthetic, particularly with emphasis on exceptional skin tones and a smooth, graceful highlight roll-off.

• Maximum flexibility in color grading is paramount, especially for subtle adjustments and preserving detail in challenging high-contrast or low-light scenarios.

• Visual effects work, particularly green/blue screen keying, requires the cleanest possible mattes and robust color separation.

• On-set reliability, ease of use, and a streamlined, intuitive camera operation are high priorities.

• Choose RED RAW (16-bit Linear, Compressed) if:

• Ultra-high resolution (e.g., 6K, 8K) is a critical technical requirement for extensive reframing, digital stabilization, or future-proofing the content for emerging display technologies.

• A "crisper," more "dramatic," or highly customizable image look is desired, with significant latitude for aggressive post-production manipulation.

• Managing file sizes and storage costs is a significant concern, as RED's efficient compression offers substantial data savings.

• The production workflow benefits from a modular camera system and the ability to extract high-resolution stills directly from motion clips.

Both ARRI and RED represent top-tier choices in professional cinema. The continuous advancements in both formats have significantly narrowed the perceived performance gap in many areas, empowering filmmakers to achieve stunning results with either system, provided they understand the unique strengths and optimal workflows for each.

---

Works cited

1. Best Overall Image Quality | Technology | Learn & Help - ARRI, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/learn-help/arri-camera-technology/best-overall-image-quality

2. RED vs. ARRI: Who makes the better cinema camera? - Videomaker, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.videomaker.com/shooting/camera-equipment/red-vs-arri-who-makes-the-better-cinema-camera/

3. Dynamic range, 12 bits vs 16 bits - Scanning Tips, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.scantips.com/basics14.html

4. Why is bit depth lower for video than photos? : r/videography - Reddit, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/videography/comments/102901i/why_is_bit_depth_lower_for_video_than_photos/

5. What Is Bit Depth and Does It Even Matter? - Fstoppers, accessed July 1, 2025, https://fstoppers.com/photoshop/what-bit-depth-and-does-it-even-matter-423879

6. What happened to “linear is inefficient because it gives too much to the brightest stop and starves the shadows”? Is it purely because they're talking about 16-bit so the sheer amount of total data in it is enough warrant not using log? Even then… : r/cinematography - Reddit, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/cinematography/comments/1av5lai/what_happened_to_linear_is_inefficient_because_it/

7. RED 16-bit linear vs. others' 12-bit : r/cinematography - Reddit, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/cinematography/comments/190h4sj/red_16bit_linear_vs_others_12bit/

8. Bit depth explained: Impact on video, image, and audio quality - FastPix, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.fastpix.io/blog/bit-depth-explained

9. Understanding Bit Depth in Digital Color Grading | Tobia Montanari, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.tobiamontanari.com/understanding-bit-depth-in-digital-color-grading/

10. Quantization Noise and Bit Depth - The Science of Sound, accessed July 1, 2025, https://science-of-sound.net/2016/01/quantization-noise-and-bit-depth/

11. ARRIRAW FAQ, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/learn-help/learn-help-camera-system/pre-postproduction/file-formats-data-handling/arriraw-faq

12. Arri Alexa's Dynamic Range: It's All in How You Use It by Art Adams - ProVideo Coalition, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.provideocoalition.com/alexa-dynamic-range-its-all-in-how-you-use-it/

13. ALEV Sensors | Technology | Learn & Help - ARRI, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/learn-help/arri-camera-technology/alev-sensors

14. The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn't Always Better in Medium Format Cameras - the last word, accessed July 1, 2025, https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/the-16-bit-fallacy-why-more-isnt-always-better-in-medium-format-cameras/

15. ALEXA 35 | Camera Systems | ARRI, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/camera-systems/cameras/alexa-35

16. Raw versus Log, DR limits - Cameras - EOSHD Forum, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/21661-raw-versus-log-dr-limits/

17. RAW bit-depth and compression options - Community.sony.com, accessed July 1, 2025, https://us.community.sony.com/s/question/0D50B00004YTYdsSAH/raw-bitdepth-and-compression-options?language=en_US

18. Look Files | Image Science | Learn & Help - ARRI, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/learn-help/learn-help-camera-system/image-science/look-files

19. Log C | Image Science | Learn & Help - ARRI, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/learn-help/learn-help-camera-system/image-science/log-c

20. ARRI LogC False Color, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/resource/blob/390448/2d469ae1e98110562fe347cea50a284b/arri-logc-false-color-specification-data.pdf

21. Differences Between RAW, LOG, and Rec 709 Camera Footage - Pixflow Blog, accessed July 1, 2025, https://pixflow.net/blog/difference-between-raw-log-and-rec-709-camera-footage/

22. ALEXA 35 SUP 1.2 - User Manual - ARRI, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/resource/blob/284044/2c3e40c90b7faae31f794dc40a5f9c58/alexa-35-user-manual-data.pdf

23. Arri LogC4 | PDF | Color - Scribd, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/647670714/Arri-LogC4

24. Image Science | Learn & Help - ARRI, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/learn-help/learn-help-camera-system/image-science

25. Blackmagic Cinema Camera, RED EPIC, and Arri Alexa RAW Camera Test Part 3: Overexposure | No Film School, accessed July 1, 2025, https://nofilmschool.com/i-like-it-raw-gif

26. Shootout: ARRI Alexa Mini vs. RED Epic-W Helium | No Film School, accessed July 1, 2025, https://nofilmschool.com/2017/02/shootout-arri-alexa-mini-vs-red-epic-w-helium

27. File Formats & Data Handling | Pre- & Postproduction | Learn & Help - ARRI, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/learn-help/learn-help-camera-system/pre-postproduction/file-formats-data-handling

28. ARRI RAW vs. ProRes: A Comparison - FJS International, accessed July 1, 2025, https://fjsinternational.com/news/arri-raw-vs-prores-a-comparison/

29. ARRI HDE Transcoder | Tools | Learn & Help, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.arri.com/en/learn-help/learn-help-camera-system/tools/arriraw-hde-transcoder

30. 12 Bit vs 16 Bit - BMPCC6K vs Red KOMODO 6K - BRAW vs R3D - 8 Bit vs 10 Bit - Video Bit Depth Guide - YouTube, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llgpuBAEYYI

31. Power Of RED - RED cameras, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.red.com/power-of-red

32. RESOLUTION RAW REDCODE - RED cameras, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.red.com/red-tech/red-tech-resolution-raw-redcode

33. REDCode from a technical standpoint | REDUSER.NET, accessed July 1, 2025, https://reduser.net/threads/redcode-from-a-technical-standpoint.55847/

34. RED TECH | REDCODE RAW - YouTube, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgaQF8nXLWg

35. Benefits of Redcode | PDF | Raw Image Format | Data Compression - Scribd, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/684538837/BENEFITS-OF-REDCODE

36. Understanding Red Codec - Cinematography.com, accessed July 1, 2025, https://cinematography.com/index.php?/forums/topic/50232-understanding-red-codec/

37. R3D Quality - RED cameras, accessed July 1, 2025, https://docs.red.com/955-0196_v1.6/Content/4_Menus/ProjSet/R3D_Quality.htm

38. A Brief Simple Overview of RED and ARRI - Flying Billykart, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.flyingbillykart.com.au/a-brief-simple-overview-of-red-and-arri-by-blair-moore/

39. Is Arri more cinematic than Red? : r/cinematography - Reddit, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/cinematography/comments/tqtku4/is_arri_more_cinematic_than_red/

40. Red vs Arri - General Discussion - Cinematography.com, accessed July 1, 2025, https://cinematography.com/index.php?/forums/topic/74490-red-vs-arri/

41. RAW IS WRONG IN 2024 – Film Advice - https://www.hurricaneimagesinc.com/, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.hurricaneimagesinc.com/raw-is-wrong-in-2024-film-advice/

42. Arri Alexa vs RED workflow. - General Discussion - Cinematography.com, accessed July 1, 2025, https://cinematography.com/index.php?/forums/topic/59355-arri-alexa-vs-red-workflow/

43. ALexa RAW or Epic Dragon for VFX? - Visual Effects Cinematography, accessed July 1, 2025, https://cinematography.com/index.php?/forums/topic/63418-alexa-raw-or-epic-dragon-for-vfx/

44. Greenscreen keying with BMRAW : r/vfx - Reddit, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/vfx/comments/sr36fd/greenscreen_keying_with_bmraw/

45. Dispelling 3 Common Myths About Shooting Raw - Frame.io Insider, accessed July 1, 2025, https://blog.frame.io/2019/12/09/raw-myths/

46. Blackmagic Cinema Camera, RED EPIC, and Arri Alexa RAW Camera Test Part 2: Low Light, accessed July 1, 2025, https://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/blackmagic-cinema-camera-red-epic-arri-alexa-raw-test-part-2-low-light

47. Computer to handle ARRI RAW footage, accessed July 1, 2025, https://forum.arri.com/viewtopic.php?t=119

48. D21 workflow - ARRI - Cinematography.com, accessed July 1, 2025, https://cinematography.com/index.php?/forums/topic/44283-d21-workflow/

49. Difference Between R3D RAW vs ARRI RAW : r/editors - Reddit, accessed July 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/editors/comments/slgjo1/difference_between_r3d_raw_vs_arri_raw/

50. RED Scarlet VS ALEXA Mini: A Comparison of Sensor, User Experience, Codec, Reliability and Price - Y.M.Cinema Magazine, accessed July 1, 2025, https://ymcinema.com/2018/10/16/red-scarlet-vs-alexa-mini-a-comparison-of-sensor-user-experience-codec-reliability-and-price/